Comparison Overview
A1 Telekom Austria AG
A1 Telekom Austria AG
Lasallestraße 9, Wien, 1020, AT
Last Update: 19/02/2026
A1 – Internet, Voice, TV and IT-Services from One Source A1 is Austria’s leading communications provider, encompassing more than 5.3 million mobile communications customers and over 2.1 million fixed access lines. The customers benefit from a global package of offers ...
Ooredoo Group
100 West Bay, Doha, Doha, QA, Po Box 217
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are an award-winning international communications company operating across the Middle East, North Africa and Southeast Asia. Serving consumers and businesses in 10 countries, we deliver a leading data experience through a broad range of content and services via ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
A1 Telekom Austria AG
Ooredoo Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A1 Telekom Austria AG in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ooredoo Group in 2026.
Incident History - A1 Telekom Austria AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A1 Telekom Austria AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Ooredoo Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ooredoo Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
A1 Telekom Austria AG
Ooredoo Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.