Comparison Overview
A1 Makedonija

A1 Makedonija
N/A
Last Update: 20/03/2026
За A1 Компанијата А1 Македонија е член на А1 Телеком Австрија Групацијата, водечки провајдер за комуникациски и дигитални решенија во Централна и Источна Европа кој работи во седум држави и обезбедува услуги на над 25 милиони корисници. На македонскиот пазар компанија...

ZTE Corporation
ZTE Corporation Hi-Tech Road South, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, CN, 518057
Last Update: 01/04/2026
ZTE connects the world with continuous innovation for a better future. The company provides innovative technologies and integrated solutions, and its portfolio spans communication networks, computing infrastructure, industry digital solutions, and personal and home sm...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

A1 Makedonija







ZTE Corporation






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A1 Makedonija in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ZTE Corporation in 2026.
Incident History - A1 Makedonija (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A1 Makedonija cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - ZTE Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ZTE Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

A1 Makedonija

ZTE Corporation
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.