A P Moller Maersk group
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
None
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
VS
HelloFresh
HelloFresh
Last Update: 2025-12-09
HelloFresh is on a mission to change the way people eat, forever! From our 2011 founding in Europe’s vibrant tech hub Berlin, we’re evolving from the world’s leading meal kit company to the world's leading food solutions group. We delivered 243.3 million meals and reached 7.5 million active customers around the world in Q3 2022. HelloFresh Group consists of six brands that provide customers with high quality food and recipes for different meal occasions. Every ingredient needed for our meals are carefully planned, responsibly sourced and delivered to your door when it’s most convenient for you. Only HelloFresh gives you the tools to achieve something delicious every day. Making a meal a delicious achievement - not just fuel for your day - takes a lot of work and smart people. From Designers and Copywriters to Data Scientists and DevOps Engineers, to potato farmers, pasta makers and the people who ensure every box is perfectly packed for every customer, we’re collectively disrupting the food supply chain and the multi-trillion-dollar food tech industry. Our more than 21,000 high-performing and ambitious employees across the globe from New York to Berlin, London to Sydney and Toronto to Milan enjoy a number of benefits including flexible working arrangements, discounts on our boxes, health and well-being and learning and development programs. We’re always looking for quality ingredients to perfect our recipe, so join us now! https://www.hellofresh.com/careers/locations
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 16,786
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
HelloFresh
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A P Moller Maersk group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
HelloFresh
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A P Moller Maersk group in 2025.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for HelloFresh in 2025.
Incident History — A P Moller Maersk group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A P Moller Maersk group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — HelloFresh (X = Date, Y = Severity)
HelloFresh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Notable Incidents
Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company
A P Moller Maersk group
Incidents
Date Detected: 6/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious ransomware
Motivation: Ransom payment
Blog: Blog
HelloFresh
Incidents
No Incident
FAQ
HelloFresh company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to A P Moller Maersk group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
A P Moller Maersk group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas HelloFresh company has not reported any.
In the current year, HelloFresh company and A P Moller Maersk group company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither HelloFresh company nor A P Moller Maersk group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Neither HelloFresh company nor A P Moller Maersk group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.
A P Moller Maersk group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while HelloFresh company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group company nor HelloFresh company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
HelloFresh company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to A P Moller Maersk group company.
HelloFresh company employs more people globally than A P Moller Maersk group company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds HIPAA certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor HelloFresh holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
