A P Moller Maersk group
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
None
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Comparison Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
VS
Glovo
Glovo
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
Glovo is a pioneering multi-category app connecting users with businesses, and couriers, offering on-demand services from local restaurants, grocers and supermarkets, and high street retail stores. Glovo’s vision is to give everyone easy access to everything within their city, so that our users can enjoy what they want, when they want, where they want. Founded in 2015 in Barcelona, it operates across 25 countries in Europe, Central Asia and Africa.
NAICS: 81
NAICS Definition: Other Services (except Public Administration)
Employees: 11,687
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Compliance Badges Comparison
Security & Compliance Standards Overview
A P Moller Maersk group
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Glovo
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
Not verified
GDPR
Not verified
PCI DSS
Not verified
HIPAA
Not verified
Compliance Summary
A P Moller Maersk group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Glovo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for A P Moller Maersk group in 2025.
Incidents vs Consumer Services Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Glovo in 2025.
Incident History — A P Moller Maersk group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
A P Moller Maersk group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
Incident History — Glovo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Glovo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
FAQ
A P Moller Maersk group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Glovo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.
A P Moller Maersk group and Glovo have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.
In the current year, Glovo company and A P Moller Maersk group company have not reported any cyber incidents.
Neither Glovo company nor A P Moller Maersk group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.
Glovo company has disclosed at least one data breach, while A P Moller Maersk group company has not reported such incidents publicly.
A P Moller Maersk group company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Glovo company has not reported such incidents publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group company nor Glovo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds any compliance certifications.
Neither company holds any compliance certifications.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group company nor Glovo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.
Glovo company employs more people globally than A P Moller Maersk group company, reflecting its scale as a Consumer Services.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds ISO 27001 certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds PCI DSS certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds HIPAA certification.
Neither A P Moller Maersk group nor Glovo holds GDPR certification.
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description
uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description
A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description
A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
