Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A New Leaf IncA New Leaf Inc
VS
American Red CrossAmerican Red Cross
A New Leaf Inc

A New Leaf Inc

2306 S 1st Place , Broken Arrow, 74012, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://anewleaf.org
764/1000Fair

A New Leaf has a social enterprise that operates 5 greenhouses, 2 Retail Garden Centers, a 3 acre farm, and a wholesale flower business. Our social enterprise is designed to support our mission to create independence for individuals with developmental disabilities and ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

430 17th St NW, Washington, 20006, US

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.redcross.org
763/1000Fair

The American Red Cross prevents and alleviates human suffering in the face of emergencies by mobilizing the power of volunteers and the generosity of donors. Each day, thousands of people – people just like you – provide compassionate care to those in need. Our networ...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:33,242
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A New Leaf Inc

A New Leaf Inc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A New Leaf Inc in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Red Cross in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - A New Leaf Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A New Leaf Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - American Red Cross (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Red Cross cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A New Leaf Inc

A New Leaf Inc

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
A-N721082025
American Red Cross

American Red Cross

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AME15579222

FAQ

Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A New Leaf Inc company and American Red Cross company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A New Leaf Inc and American Red Cross, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A New Leaf Inc and American Red Cross, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A New Leaf Inc or American Red Cross ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A New Leaf Inc or American Red Cross ?
Between A New Leaf Inc and American Red Cross, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A New Leaf Inc and American Red Cross, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA