Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A.F. SmithA.F. Smith
VS
StaplesStaples
A.F. Smith

A.F. Smith

7 Tumkins Lane, Hamilton, undefined, HM09, BM

Last Update: 10/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.afsmith.bm
748/1000Moderate

Life's short. Love your work. When you express the need to increase productivity, lower costs, and create new sources of competitive advantage, we know exactly what you are seeking. Here at A.F. Smith, the focus is on your workplace and how we may improve it to increa...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Staples

Staples

500 Staples Drive, Framingham, 01702, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.staples.com
691/1000Weak

For nearly 40 years, Staples has been a trusted leader in delivering end-to-end workplace solutions for consumers and businesses of all sizes across a broad range of industries. The company provides a comprehensive portfolio of products, strategic solutions, and service...

NAICS:45321
NAICS Definition:Office Supplies and Stationery Stores
Employees:32,486
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A.F. Smith

A.F. Smith

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Staples

Staples

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A.F. Smith in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Office Equipment Industry Avg (This Year)

Staples has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - A.F. Smith (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A.F. Smith cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Staples (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Staples cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A.F. Smith

A.F. Smith

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AFS2728622
Staples

Staples

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
STA1775075784
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STA23584224
🔒 Incident : Breach
STA607072725

FAQ

Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A.F. Smith company and Staples company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A.F. Smith and Staples, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A.F. Smith and Staples, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A.F. Smith or Staples ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A.F. Smith or Staples ?
Between A.F. Smith and Staples, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A.F. Smith and Staples, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA