Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A Bar AboveA Bar Above
VS
Harbor Freight ToolsHarbor Freight Tools
A Bar Above

A Bar Above

undefined, Carlsbad, CA, 92008, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.abarabove.com
753/1000Fair

OUR STORY We’re a husband-wife team of cocktail nerds who started A Bar Above way back in 2013, dreaming of a website that would help make craft bar education accessible to everyone. What started as a blog and YouTube channel quickly grew to include a podcast, online ...

NAICS:452
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:13
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

26677 Agoura Road, Calabasas, 91302, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.HFJobs.com
797/1000Fair

We're a 45 year-old, $8 billion national tool retailer with the energy, enthusiasm, and growth potential of a start-up. We have over 1,600 stores in 48 states across the country and are opening several new locations every week. We offer our customers more than 7,000 too...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:15,933
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A Bar Above

A Bar Above

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A Bar Above in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Harbor Freight Tools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - A Bar Above (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A Bar Above cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Harbor Freight Tools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Harbor Freight Tools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A Bar Above

A Bar Above

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Harbor Freight Tools

Harbor Freight Tools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HAR305072525

FAQ

Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A Bar Above company and Harbor Freight Tools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A Bar Above and Harbor Freight Tools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A Bar Above and Harbor Freight Tools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A Bar Above or Harbor Freight Tools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A Bar Above or Harbor Freight Tools ?
Between A Bar Above and Harbor Freight Tools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A Bar Above and Harbor Freight Tools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA