Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.
VS
RSK GroupRSK Group
A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

10010 E. 16th Street, Tulsa, 74128, US

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
751/1000Fair

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (A & M) is a self certified small business (SBA) that is also HUBZone certified. We have been providing quality services including compliance and consulting, engineering and design, and construction and remediation for...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:65
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
RSK Group

RSK Group

Spring Lodge, 172 Chester Road, Helsby, Cheshire, GB, WA6 0AR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://rskgroup.com/
771/1000Fair

RSK Group is a global leader in the delivery of environmental and engineering solutions. We recognise the urgent need for sustainable change and know that this will be achieved by delivering meaningful action, not just words. We are committed to supporting our clients a...

NAICS:54162
NAICS Definition:Environmental Consulting Services
Employees:11,990
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
RSK Group

RSK Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Environmental Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RSK Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - RSK Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RSK Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
RSK Group

RSK Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. company and RSK Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and RSK Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and RSK Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. or RSK Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. or RSK Group ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and RSK Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A & M Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. and RSK Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA