Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

A & A Vending Co., Inc.A & A Vending Co., Inc.
VS
Almarai - المراعيAlmarai - المراعي
A & A Vending Co., Inc.

A & A Vending Co., Inc.

undefined, Akron, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aavending.com
762/1000Fair

Since 1984, A & A Vending has been offering the Northeast Ohio area the highest level of service. Whether it’s our state-of-the-art vending machines, our unrivaled selection of vending snacks, sodas and other beverages, or our premiere office coffee service, A & A Vendi...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:27
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Almarai - المراعي

Almarai - المراعي

Almarai Building Circle Road, Exit 7 Al Izdihar Distric, Riyadh, Central Province, SA, P. O. Box 8524 | Riyadh 11492 | Saudi Arabia

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.almarai.com
793/1000Fair

Founded in 1977, Almarai Company is the world’s largest vertically integrated dairy company and the largest food and beverage manufacturing and distribution company in MENA. Headquartered in Riyadh, Almarai Company is ranked as the number one FMCG Brand in the MENA regi...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:51,569
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
A & A Vending Co., Inc.

A & A Vending Co., Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Almarai - المراعي

Almarai - المراعي

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for A & A Vending Co., Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Almarai - المراعي in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - A & A Vending Co., Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

A & A Vending Co., Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Almarai - المراعي (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Almarai - المراعي cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
A & A Vending Co., Inc.

A & A Vending Co., Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Almarai - المراعي

Almarai - المراعي

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. company and Almarai - المراعي company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. and Almarai - المراعي, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. and Almarai - المراعي, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - A & A Vending Co., Inc. or Almarai - المراعي ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - A & A Vending Co., Inc. or Almarai - المراعي ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. and Almarai - المراعي, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between A & A Vending Co., Inc. and Almarai - المراعي, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8