Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

99 Bikes99 Bikes
VS
S-ryhmä / S GroupS-ryhmä / S Group
99 Bikes

99 Bikes

66 Abbotsford Rd, Bowen Hills, Queensland, AU, 4006

Last Update: 23/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.99bikes.com.au
771/1000Fair

99 Bikes is Australia’s largest bicycle retailer and part of the highly successful Flight Centre Travel Group. With a fast growing network of stores across the country, 99 Bikes plans on operating 185 stores in 5 countries by 2035, making us the largest group of bike sh...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:367
Subsidiaries:51
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
S-ryhmä / S Group

S-ryhmä / S Group

Fleminginkatu 34, Helsinki, Southern Finland, FI

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://s-ryhma.fi/
787/1000Fair

S-ryhmä on suomalainen vähittäiskaupan ja palvelualan yritysverkosto, jolla on Suomessa yli 1 800 toimipaikkaa. S-ryhmä muodostuu 19 itsenäisestä alueosuuskaupasta ja niiden omistamasta Suomen Osuuskauppojen Keskuskunnasta (SOK) tytäryhtiöineen. Alueellisten ja valtakun...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:10,352
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
99 Bikes

99 Bikes

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
S-ryhmä / S Group

S-ryhmä / S Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 99 Bikes in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for S-ryhmä / S Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 99 Bikes (X = Date, Y = Severity)

99 Bikes cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - S-ryhmä / S Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S-ryhmä / S Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
99 Bikes

99 Bikes

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
S-ryhmä / S Group

S-ryhmä / S Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 99 Bikes company and S-ryhmä / S Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 99 Bikes and S-ryhmä / S Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 99 Bikes and S-ryhmä / S Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 99 Bikes or S-ryhmä / S Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 99 Bikes or S-ryhmä / S Group ?
Between 99 Bikes and S-ryhmä / S Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 99 Bikes and S-ryhmä / S Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-111865
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in THU-MIG yoloe up to 40cd606cabdbe2b566d6f14a6b162c89206e9a1b. This affects the function eval of the file ultralytics/nn/autobackend.py of the component AutoBackend Model Loading. The manipulation of the argument imgsz/names/kpt_shape results in improper neutralization of directives in dynamically evaluated code. The attack requires a local approach. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. This product does not use versioning. This is why information about affected and unaffected releases are unavailable. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-111934
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.34.7 contains an IP spoofing vulnerability in the ExtractRealIPAddress middleware that trusts the leftmost, client-supplied X-Forwarded-For value instead of the client IP appended by a reverse proxy. Attackers can send forged X-Forwarded-For values through appending proxies to bypass per-IP rate limits on login, one-time passcode, and password validation endpoints, enabling brute-force attacks, and to falsify IP addresses recorded in audit logs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111933
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a user enumeration vulnerability because userpassword.Compare() substitutes a placeholder hash derived from the string "hunter2" when a stored password hash is empty. Unauthenticated attackers can submit logins with the password "hunter2" and distinguish HTTP 403 from 401 responses to enumerate valid accounts and reveal the authentication provider of SSO-only users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-111932
SUMMARY

Coder before 2.29.17, 2.30.0 before 2.32.7, 2.33.0 before 2.33.8, and 2.34.0 before 2.34.2 contains a stored HTML injection vulnerability because the ApplicationName and LogoURL appearance settings are rendered into HTML output without sufficient escaping. Attackers with the Owner role can store HTML markup in these settings that renders in the Coder dashboard and in SMTP notification emails sent to other deployment users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-111931
SUMMARY

Coder from 2.0.0 before 2.34.8 contains an open redirect vulnerability in handleAPIKeySmuggling that allows attackers to redirect users externally via unsanitized r.URL.Path values. Attackers can craft links on trusted workspace app subdomains with paths beginning with double slashes, which become scheme-relative redirects to attacker sites for phishing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-17
UPDATED
Date2026-10-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8