Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

8D (Acquired by Lyft)8D (Acquired by Lyft)
VS
IGTIGT
8D (Acquired by Lyft)

8D (Acquired by Lyft)

416 de Maisonneuve West, Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1L2, CA

Last Update: 04/01/2026

View Profile
749/1000Moderate

Lyft Quebec R&D, Inc., a member of the Lyft family, is a world leader in the development of the most innovative, intelligent wireless, Machine-to-Machine (M2M), multi-function point of sale (POS) solutions. To explore career opportunities with us, please visit the Lyf...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IGT

IGT

6355 S Buffalo Dr, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89113

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.IGT.com
568/1000Very Poor

IGT is a leading global provider of gaming, digital and financial technology solutions, formed through the combination of International Game Technology PLC’s Gaming & Digital Business and Everi Holdings Inc. IGT’s offering spans gaming machines, game content and systems...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:10,303
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
8D (Acquired by Lyft)

8D (Acquired by Lyft)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IGT

IGT

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 8D (Acquired by Lyft) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IGT in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 8D (Acquired by Lyft) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

8D (Acquired by Lyft) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IGT (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IGT cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
8D (Acquired by Lyft)

8D (Acquired by Lyft)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IGT

IGT

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IGT2192021112025
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IGT2502025112125

FAQ

Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) company and IGT company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) and IGT, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) and IGT, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 8D (Acquired by Lyft) or IGT ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 8D (Acquired by Lyft) or IGT ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) and IGT, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 8D (Acquired by Lyft) and IGT, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA