Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL
VS
VCA Animal HospitalsVCA Animal Hospitals
5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

1103 WOODLAND STREET, NASHVILLE, Tennessee, 37206, US

Last Update: 20/01/2026

View Profile

5 Points Animal Hospital is located in Nashville, TN.

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:74
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
VCA Animal Hospitals

VCA Animal Hospitals

VCA Animal Hospitals, 12401 West Olympic Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, US, 90064

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.VCAcareers.com
771/1000Fair

A leader in veterinary care, VCA Animal Hospitals is committed to taking care of the future of veterinary medicine. We are a family of hometown animal hospitals determined to positively impact pets, people and our communities. From general practice to emergency and spec...

NAICS:54194
NAICS Definition:Veterinary Services
Employees:10,747
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VCA Animal Hospitals

VCA Animal Hospitals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Veterinary Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Veterinary Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VCA Animal Hospitals in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VCA Animal Hospitals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VCA Animal Hospitals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
VCA Animal Hospitals

VCA Animal Hospitals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL company and VCA Animal Hospitals company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL and VCA Animal Hospitals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL and VCA Animal Hospitals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL or VCA Animal Hospitals ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL or VCA Animal Hospitals ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL and VCA Animal Hospitals, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 5 POINTS ANIMAL HOSPITAL and VCA Animal Hospitals, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1