Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

3Shape Poland3Shape Poland
VS
AlconAlcon
3Shape Poland

3Shape Poland

Południowa, Szczecin, zachodniopomorskie, 71-001, PL

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.3shape.com/en
759/1000Fair

3Shape Poland to dynamiczne centrum technologiczne, w którym rozwijamy przełomowe rozwiązania dla branży stomatologicznej. Jesteśmy częścią globalnej firmy 3Shape, lidera w dziedzinie cyfrowej stomatologii, a nasz zespół w Polsce łączy inżynierię, IT i produkcję, dostar...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Alcon

Alcon

Avenue Louis-Casaï 58, Geneva, 1216, CH

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.alcon.com
727/1000Moderate

Alcon helps people see brilliantly. As the global leader in eye care with a heritage spanning over 75 years, we offer the broadest portfolio of products to enhance sight and improve people’s lives. Our Surgical and Vision Care products touch the lives of more than 260 m...

NAICS:3391
NAICS Definition:Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees:27,779
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
3Shape Poland

3Shape Poland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Alcon

Alcon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 3Shape Poland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Alcon has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - 3Shape Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

3Shape Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Alcon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alcon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
3Shape Poland

3Shape Poland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Alcon

Alcon

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NIKALC1783600235
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALC532072725

FAQ

Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 3Shape Poland company and Alcon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 3Shape Poland and Alcon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 3Shape Poland and Alcon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 3Shape Poland or Alcon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 3Shape Poland or Alcon ?
Between 3Shape Poland and Alcon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 3Shape Poland and Alcon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES