Comparison Overview
3P Corporation Ltd

3P Corporation Ltd
Level 1, 390 St Kilda Rd, Melbourne, 3004, AU
Last Update: 24/03/2026
At 3P we have a PASSION for PEOPLE to PROSPER. We take a powerful, relationship-based approach from the top to the bottom of each of the 3P service delivery pillars. The 3P service-delivery vision, intention, strategy and ideology are bolted, ready to power our passion...

Discovery Limited
1 Discovery Place, Sandhurst, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2196
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Imagine a world where people live healthier, more enhanced and protected lives… A world in which each organisation is a powerful influencer and responsible corporate citizen, committed to being a force for social good. As a leading innovator in healthcare, wellness, ins...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

3P Corporation Ltd







Discovery Limited






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 3P Corporation Ltd in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Discovery Limited in 2026.
Incident History - 3P Corporation Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
3P Corporation Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Discovery Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Discovery Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

3P Corporation Ltd

Discovery Limited
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.