Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

310 Nutrition310 Nutrition
VS
Life Time Inc.Life Time Inc.
310 Nutrition

310 Nutrition

4270 S Decatur Blvd, None, Las Vegas, NV, US, 89103

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.310nutrition.com
747/1000Moderate

Since 2012, 310 Nutrition has become one of the fastest growing leaders in the health and nutrition industries. Our passion is helping our customers improve their lives with proven solutions that encourage healthy habits with the support of an engaged community to take ...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:48
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

2902 Corporate Place, Chanhassen, MN, US, 55317

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.lifetime.life/
785/1000Fair

Life Time provides an entertaining, educational, friendly and inviting, functional and innovative experience of uncompromising quality that meets the health and fitness needs of the entire family. Life Time is a wellness pioneer reshaping the way consumers approach the...

NAICS:71394
NAICS Definition:Fitness and Recreational Sports Centers
Employees:19,900
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
310 Nutrition

310 Nutrition

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 310 Nutrition in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wellness and Fitness Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Life Time Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 310 Nutrition (X = Date, Y = Severity)

310 Nutrition cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Life Time Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Life Time Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
310 Nutrition

310 Nutrition

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
310300072925
Life Time Inc.

Life Time Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 310 Nutrition company and Life Time Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 310 Nutrition and Life Time Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 310 Nutrition and Life Time Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 310 Nutrition or Life Time Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 310 Nutrition or Life Time Inc. ?
Between 310 Nutrition and Life Time Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 310 Nutrition and Life Time Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA