Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

2TN (2 the Nth)2TN (2 the Nth)
VS
Teva PharmaceuticalsTeva Pharmaceuticals
2TN (2 the Nth)

2TN (2 the Nth)

N/A

Last Update: 02/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.2thenth.com/
802/1000Good

2TN is a medical communications agency delivering creative and inspiring projects across the healthcare industry. 2TN is proud to be a part of the Adelphi Group and the Omnicom Group.

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Teva Pharmaceuticals

124 Dvora hanevi'a, Tel-Aviv, IL, 6944020

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.tevapharm.com
805/1000Good

Teva Pharmaceuticals is a leading innovative biopharmaceutical company, enabled by a world-class generics business. For over 120 years, Teva’s commitment has never wavered. From innovating in the fields of neuroscience and immunology to providing complex generic medicin...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:29,951
Subsidiaries:5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
2TN (2 the Nth)

2TN (2 the Nth)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Teva Pharmaceuticals

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 2TN (2 the Nth) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Teva Pharmaceuticals in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 2TN (2 the Nth) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

2TN (2 the Nth) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Teva Pharmaceuticals (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Teva Pharmaceuticals cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
2TN (2 the Nth)

2TN (2 the Nth)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Teva Pharmaceuticals

Teva Pharmaceuticals

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) company and Teva Pharmaceuticals company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) and Teva Pharmaceuticals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) and Teva Pharmaceuticals, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 2TN (2 the Nth) or Teva Pharmaceuticals ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 2TN (2 the Nth) or Teva Pharmaceuticals ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) and Teva Pharmaceuticals, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 2TN (2 the Nth) and Teva Pharmaceuticals, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA