Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Hotel 55, Chicago DowntownHotel 55, Chicago Downtown
VS
J D WetherspoonJ D Wetherspoon
Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

55 E Ontario St, Chicago, 60611, US

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.marriott.com/chidb
773/1000Fair

Located in the heart of Chicago’s vibrant River North district and just steps from Michigan Avenue, Hotel 55 blends artful design with modern comfort. Featuring 297 thoughtfully appointed guest rooms, the hotel offers an inspired stay experience that connects travelers ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
J D Wetherspoon

J D Wetherspoon

Central Park, Watford, WD24 4QL, GB

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
789/1000Fair

J D Wetherspoon is a leading pub operator in the UK and Ireland. Back in 1979, founder chairman Tim Martin opened the very first Wetherspoon – in Muswell Hill, north London. Today, Tim and the company run over 850 pubs and hotels, spread right across the UK and, more re...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:12,315
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
J D Wetherspoon

J D Wetherspoon

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for J D Wetherspoon in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - J D Wetherspoon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

J D Wetherspoon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
J D Wetherspoon

J D Wetherspoon

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown company and J D Wetherspoon company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown and J D Wetherspoon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown and J D Wetherspoon, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown or J D Wetherspoon ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown or J D Wetherspoon ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown and J D Wetherspoon, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Hotel 55, Chicago Downtown and J D Wetherspoon, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA