Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

215 McCann215 McCann
VS
dentsudentsu
215 McCann

215 McCann

215 Leidesdorff Street, San Francisco, California, 94111, US

Last Update: 06/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.215mccann.com
749/1000Moderate

We’re 215 McCann, a boutique agency with West Coast roots. But we like to think of ourselves as 215 EVERYWHERE... Because our people, clients, and impact can be found all over the world. We are part of McCann Worldgroup, with the passion, collaboration and nimbleness of...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:16
Subsidiaries:36
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
dentsu

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, JP

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
https://bit.ly/3lDa6Ff
684/1000Weak

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experi...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:19,113
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
215 McCann

215 McCann

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
dentsu

dentsu

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 215 McCann in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 215 McCann (X = Date, Y = Severity)

215 McCann cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
215 McCann

215 McCann

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
dentsu

dentsu

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN1492114110225
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEN0962609112125

FAQ

Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 215 McCann company and dentsu company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 215 McCann and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 215 McCann and dentsu, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 215 McCann or dentsu ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 215 McCann or dentsu ?
Between 215 McCann and dentsu, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 215 McCann and dentsu, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA