Comparison Overview
1stinrail

1stinrail
1D North Crescent, Cody Road, London, E16 4TG, GB
Last Update: 29/12/2025
1stinrail specialise in Permanent Way Engineering for all track types, from feasibility through to commissioning, and for all forms of track; we provide 24/7 planned and reactive rail works throughout the UK. We draw on decades of experience in all aspects of the rail i...

Civil Engineer
New York, US
Last Update: 05/04/2026
A civil engineer is a person who practices civil engineering – the application of planning, designing, constructing, maintaining, and operating infrastructures while protecting the public and environmental health, as well as improving existing infrastructures that have ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

1stinrail







Civil Engineer






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for 1stinrail in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Civil Engineer in 2026.
Incident History - 1stinrail (X = Date, Y = Severity)
1stinrail cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Civil Engineer (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Civil Engineer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

1stinrail

Civil Engineer
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.