Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

1st Franklin Financial Corporation1st Franklin Financial Corporation
VS
Moody's CorporationMoody's Corporation
1st Franklin Financial Corporation

1st Franklin Financial Corporation

135 E. Tugaloo St., Toccoa, GA, US, 30577

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.1ffc.com/
728/1000Moderate

Since 1941, 1st Franklin Financial Corporation has had one goal—Serving communities by offering opportunities to individuals and families through financial services. It’s been over 85 years since Founder Ben F. Cheek, Jr. made his first $34 auto loan. While times have c...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:1,037
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Moody's Corporation

Moody's Corporation

250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, US, 10007

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.moodys.com
783/1000Fair

In a world shaped by increasingly interconnected risks, Moody’s helps customers develop a holistic view of these risks to advance their business and act decisively. With a rich history of expertise in global markets and a diverse workforce in more than 40 countries, Moo...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:15,041
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
1st Franklin Financial Corporation

1st Franklin Financial Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Moody's Corporation

Moody's Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1st Franklin Financial Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Moody's Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 1st Franklin Financial Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1st Franklin Financial Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Moody's Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Moody's Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
1st Franklin Financial Corporation

1st Franklin Financial Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
1ST823072625
Moody's Corporation

Moody's Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation company and Moody's Corporation company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and Moody's Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and Moody's Corporation, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 1st Franklin Financial Corporation or Moody's Corporation ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 1st Franklin Financial Corporation or Moody's Corporation ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and Moody's Corporation, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 1st Franklin Financial Corporation and Moody's Corporation, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1