Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

1898 & Co.1898 & Co.
VS
StraiveStraive
1898 & Co.

1898 & Co.

9400 Ward Parkway, Kansas City, Missouri, 64114, US

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://1898andco.burnsmcd.com/
754/1000Fair

1898 & Co. turns business and technology insights into action for critical infrastructure industries. For years, multidisciplinary teams inside Burns & McDonnell have come together to support clients and engineering and construction teams with strategic insight, techno...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:566
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Straive

Straive

77 Robinson Road, # 13-00, Singapore, SG, 068896

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.straive.com/
785/1000Fair

At Straive, we operationalize Data Analytics and AI for global enterprises, working with several Fortune 500 companies. We don’t just build world-class data analytics and AI solutions—we embed them seamlessly into your core workflows. This drives greater efficiency, enh...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:13,246
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
1898 & Co.

1898 & Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Straive

Straive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 1898 & Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Straive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 1898 & Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

1898 & Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Straive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Straive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
1898 & Co.

1898 & Co.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Straive

Straive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 1898 & Co. company and Straive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 1898 & Co. and Straive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 1898 & Co. and Straive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 1898 & Co. or Straive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 1898 & Co. or Straive ?
Between 1898 & Co. and Straive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 1898 & Co. and Straive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES