Comparison Overview
Tesco

Tesco
Shire Park, Welwyn Garden City, AL7 1GA, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
One of the world’s largest retailers of consumer goods from food to fashion. Serving our customers, communities and planet a little better every day in our stores and online is at the heart of everything we do. Founded in 1919 by Jack Cohen using the £30 he received on...

americanas s.a.
Rua Coelho e Castro 60, Rio de Janeiro, BR, 20081-060
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are Americanas, one of the largest retailers in the country, with over 95 years of history. Our brand, loved by Brazilians, aims to simplify and improve the lives of families. The integration of more than 1,600 stores across all states, along with an e-commerce platf...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Tesco







americanas s.a.






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
Tesco has 48.19% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for americanas s.a. in 2026.
Incident History - Tesco (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Tesco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - americanas s.a. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
americanas s.a. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Tesco

americanas s.a.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.