Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Procter & Gamble ItaliaProcter & Gamble Italia
VS
Vedanta GroupVedanta Group
Procter & Gamble Italia

Procter & Gamble Italia

Viale Giorgio Ribotta, Rome, 00144, IT

Last Update: 21/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://it.pg.com
766/1000Fair

Le nostre marche sono accolte con fiducia in milioni di salotti, cucine, lavanderie e bagni e vengono tramandati di generazione in generazione. Nel corso di 181 anni hanno sfidato le convenzioni, guidato l’innovazione e contribuito al progresso culturale. Continuiamo a...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:24
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Vedanta Resources, London, GB

Last Update: 20/04/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

We operate on the belief that our people are our core assets and we consistently endeavour towards developing their potential to be our future leaders and key employees. We currently operate in India, South Africa, Liberia and Namibia, through our various subsidiaries. ...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:18,513
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Procter & Gamble Italia

Procter & Gamble Italia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Procter & Gamble Italia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Vedanta Group has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Procter & Gamble Italia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Procter & Gamble Italia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vedanta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vedanta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Procter & Gamble Italia

Procter & Gamble Italia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vedanta Group

Vedanta Group

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
VEDJAI1776688765

FAQ

Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia company and Vedanta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia and Vedanta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Procter & Gamble Italia or Vedanta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Procter & Gamble Italia or Vedanta Group ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia and Vedanta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Procter & Gamble Italia and Vedanta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56785
SUMMARY

FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54588
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-48493
SUMMARY

Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-47693
SUMMARY

Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-12164
SUMMARY

Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-23
UPDATED
Date2026-06-23
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
0.8