Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

(m)PHASIZE(m)PHASIZE
VS
OgilvyOgilvy
(m)PHASIZE

(m)PHASIZE

274 Riverside Ave, Westport, Connecticut, 06880, US

Last Update: 27/11/2025

View Profile
750/1000Fair

(m)PHASIZE is a global analytics company that identifies where to make marketing investments that enable profitable business growth. (m)PHASIZE has developed better approaches for maximizing the effectiveness and ROI of marketing investments. Our game changing analy...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:85
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Ogilvy

Ogilvy

175 Greenwich St, New York, NY, US, 10007

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ogilvy.com
799/1000Fair

Ogilvy has been creating impact for brands through iconic, culture-changing, value-driving ideas since the company was founded by David Ogilvy 75 years ago. We build on that rich legacy through Borderless Creativity – innovating at the intersections of its advertising, ...

NAICS:541613
NAICS Definition:Marketing Consulting Services
Employees:11,136
Subsidiaries:53
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
(m)PHASIZE

(m)PHASIZE

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ogilvy

Ogilvy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for (m)PHASIZE in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ogilvy in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - (m)PHASIZE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

(m)PHASIZE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ogilvy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ogilvy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
(m)PHASIZE

(m)PHASIZE

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Ogilvy

Ogilvy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between (m)PHASIZE company and Ogilvy company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between (m)PHASIZE and Ogilvy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between (m)PHASIZE and Ogilvy, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - (m)PHASIZE or Ogilvy ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - (m)PHASIZE or Ogilvy ?
Between (m)PHASIZE and Ogilvy, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between (m)PHASIZE and Ogilvy, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9