Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

+FRESH.i.AM++FRESH.i.AM+
VS
Bata GroupBata Group
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

undefined, Los Angeles, 650 S spring St, Apt 508, 90014, US

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.freshiam.net
817/1000Good

+F.i.A+ is a multi-tiered creative entity that brings together art, fashion, music, and culture. WE CREATE, RE-INVENT, LIVE LIFE, AND PUSH BOUNDARIES. We take ideas long past and give it a new spin. We aren't different nor anything new, but something fresh. Take it all ...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:12
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bata Group

Bata Group

Avenue d'ouchy 61, Lausanne, 1006, CH

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bata.com
788/1000Fair

The Bata Group is one of the world's leading manufacturers and retailers of quality footwear. A global concern with more than 32,000 employees, 21 production facilities, over 5,300 stores in more than 70 countries across the globe, Bata has been providing the best shoes...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:15,055
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bata Group

Bata Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for +FRESH.i.AM+ in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bata Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - +FRESH.i.AM+ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

+FRESH.i.AM+ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bata Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bata Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
+FRESH.i.AM+

+FRESH.i.AM+

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bata Group

Bata Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ company and Bata Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Bata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Bata Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - +FRESH.i.AM+ or Bata Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - +FRESH.i.AM+ or Bata Group ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Bata Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between +FRESH.i.AM+ and Bata Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1