Comparison Overview

SERES

VS

Royal Enfield

SERES

中国重庆两江新区两江大道602号, None, 两江, 重庆, CN, 400000
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

Chongqing Jinkang New Energy Automobile Co.,Ltd, founded in 2012, is a wholly owned subsidiary of SOKON Group and the 8th one to obtain the new energy license of MIIT in China. Now the group has carried out the global intelligent automobile layout in China, America, Germany and Japan, which is committed to becoming the world's leading intelligent car brand enterprise. In Silicon Valley, the group set up SF Motors R & D center and the production base, inviting the founder of Tesla, Martin Eberhard to join in, and acquiring AC Propulsion, InEVit, and the original Hummer factory respectively. In Chongqing, China, the group established Jinkang R & D center and the production base, with the layout of the Technology Center, Electric Drive Company and Vehicle Company. The group converges and integrates the world's leading technology and talent resources to build the world's top R & D team, and master the world's leading HV battery, E-motor and control system, intelligentization, lightweight and other core technologies. The group also landed the European advanced manufacturing technology in Chongqing by setting up a digital manufacturing plant with the standard of Chongqing benchmarking, leading in China and world class. On March 28, 2018 (Pacific Time), SF MOTORS held its first global press conference in Silicon Valley. Two new smart electric SUV, SF5 and SF7, appeared together with the self-developed smart electric vehicle technology. On July 25, 2018(Beijing Time), SF MOTORS released the Chinese brand "Golden Vehicle EV"​ on its exclusive CCTV 1 "机智过人"​ column. SF5 will open the mass production experience in January 2019, open the Chinese market reservation in March, formally launch in the third quarter of 2019, and achieve mass delivery.

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 92
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Royal Enfield

Eicher Motors, #96, Sector 32,, Gurgaon, Haryana -, 122001, IN
Last Update: 2025-11-25

The oldest motorcycle brand in continuous production, Royal Enfield made its first motorcycle in 1901. A division of Eicher Motors Limited, Royal Enfield has created the mid-sized motorcycle segment in India with its unique and distinctive modern classic bikes. Royal Enfield operates in 60+ countries across the world with more than 3000 retail touch points globally, 5 CKD units (Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Nepal, & Thailand), 3 state-of-the-art manufacturing facilities based out of Chennai, India and two technical centers - in India and in the UK. Watch Royal Enfield's incredible journey here - https://youtu.be/UvR57lwJptk

NAICS: 3361
NAICS Definition: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 17,284
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/金康新能源汽车.jpeg
SERES
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
SERES
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Royal Enfield
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SERES in 2025.

Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Royal Enfield in 2025.

Incident History — SERES (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SERES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Royal Enfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Royal Enfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/金康新能源汽车.jpeg
SERES
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/royal-enfield.jpeg
Royal Enfield
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

SERES company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Royal Enfield company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Royal Enfield company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to SERES company.

In the current year, Royal Enfield company and SERES company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor SERES company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor SERES company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Royal Enfield company nor SERES company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither SERES company nor Royal Enfield company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither SERES company nor Royal Enfield company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Royal Enfield company employs more people globally than SERES company, reflecting its scale as a Motor Vehicle Manufacturing.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds HIPAA certification.

Neither SERES nor Royal Enfield holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H