Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司复星保德信人寿保险有限公司
VS
GallagherGallagher
复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

芳甸路1155号浦东嘉里城36F, None, 浦东新区, 上海市, CN, None

Last Update: 09/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.pflife.com.cn
754/1000Fair

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司是由复星集团与美国保德信金融集团联合发起组建的合资保险公司,经中国保险监督管理委员会批准,于2012年9月正式成立,总部位于上海。公司注册资本为10亿元人民币,股东双方各持有合资公司50%的股份。 基于股东双方相同的经营理念,复星保德信致力于成为一家“成功并与众不同”的人寿保险公司。公司将通过包括职场营销、代理人、银行保险、多元行销等在内的不同销售渠道,采用以价值为导向的需求分析方式,为客户提供差异化的产品与服务。 复星保德信秉持“以人为本,以诚取信”的理念,倡导具有团队精神、诚实正直、高忠诚度...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:284
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gallagher

Gallagher

2850 Golf Road, Rolling Meadows, 60008, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
763/1000Fair

Gallagher, a global insurance brokerage, risk management, and consulting firm, serves communities around the globe, helping clients address risk, protecting assets, and recovering from losses. The products and services we provide keep businesses and institutions running...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:46,421
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gallagher

Gallagher

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Gallagher in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gallagher (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gallagher cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

复星保德信人寿保险有限公司

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gallagher

Gallagher

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL24413322
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL849072625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAL049072425

FAQ

Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 company and Gallagher company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 and Gallagher, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 or Gallagher ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 or Gallagher ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 and Gallagher, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 复星保德信人寿保险有限公司 and Gallagher, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48579
SUMMARY

Improper authorization in Microsoft Exchange Online allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48567
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure HorizonDB allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-47655
SUMMARY

Exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor in Microsoft Graph allows an authorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-47644
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Copilot Chat (Microsoft Edge) allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-45497
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of special elements used in a command ('command injection') in Microsoft Copilot allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-04
UPDATED
Date2026-06-04
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8