Comparison Overview

BIT Mining Limited

VS

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield

BIT Mining Limited

Cyberport 3, 100 Cyberport Road, Units 813 & 815, Level 8, Core F, Hong Kong, None, HK, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.btcm.group/

BIT Mining (NYSE: BTCM) is a leading technology-driven cryptocurrency mining company, with a long-term strategy to create value across the cryptocurrency industry. Its business covers cryptocurrency mining, mining pool, and data center operation. The Company owns the world's top blockchain browser BTC.com and the comprehensive mining pool business operated under BTC.com, providing multi-currency mining services including BTC, ETH and LTC. The Company has also entered into a definitive agreement to acquire a 7-nanometer cryptocurrency mining machine manufacturer, Bee Computing, to complete the Company's vertical integration with its supply chain, increase its self-sufficiency and strengthen its competitive position.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield

114 H Street, Bakersfield, CA, 93304, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.CooksExpetec.com

Cook’s Expetec is taking care of technology for businesses and professional services in Bakersfield, Kern County, Shafter, Taft, Delano, Wasco, San Joaquin Valley and the Golden Empire. Cook’s Expetec of Bakersfield are business owners just like you, but they’re technology professionals who are expertly trained to make your IT easier to manage and use. With solutions from the professionals at Expetec, you can increase productivity and profitability, whether you’re just starting out or simply need to update your current technology.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/比特矿业.jpeg
BIT Mining Limited
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cook's-expetec-of-bakersfield.jpeg
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
BIT Mining Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BIT Mining Limited in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield in 2025.

Incident History — BIT Mining Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BIT Mining Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/比特矿业.jpeg
BIT Mining Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cook's-expetec-of-bakersfield.jpeg
Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to BIT Mining Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to BIT Mining Limited company.

In the current year, Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company and BIT Mining Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company nor BIT Mining Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company nor BIT Mining Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company nor BIT Mining Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither BIT Mining Limited company nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither BIT Mining Limited company nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

BIT Mining Limited company employs more people globally than Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds HIPAA certification.

Neither BIT Mining Limited nor Cook's Expetec of Bakersfield holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References
Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.

Published
Date
2025-11-27
Updated
Date
2025-11-27
References