Comparison Overview

Zydus Group

VS

MSD

Zydus Group

Zydus Corporate Park, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, 382481, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zyduslife.com

The Zydus Group with an overarching purpose of empowering people with freedom to live healthier and more fulfilled lives, is an innovative, global life-sciences company that discovers, develops, manufactures, and markets a broad range of healthcare therapies. The group employs over 27000 people worldwide and is driven by its mission to unlock new possibilities in life-sciences through quality healthcare solutions that impact lives. The group aspires to transform lives through pathbreaking discoveries.

NAICS: 325
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18,313
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

MSD

90 E Scott Ave, Rahway, New Jersey, US, 07065
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.msd.com

At MSD, known as Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA in the United States and Canada, we are unified around our purpose: We use the power of leading-edge science to save and improve lives around the world. For more than 130 years, we have brought hope to humanity through the development of important medicines and vaccines. We aspire to be the premier research-intensive biopharmaceutical company in the world – and today, we are at the forefront of research to deliver innovative health solutions that advance the prevention and treatment of diseases in people and animals. We foster a diverse and inclusive global workforce and operate responsibly every day to enable a safe, sustainable and healthy future for all people and communities. For more information, visit www.msd.com and connect with us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and YouTube.

NAICS: 3254
NAICS Definition: Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees: 35,519
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zyduscadila.jpeg
Zydus Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msd-global.jpeg
MSD
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zydus Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MSD
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zydus Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

MSD has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Zydus Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zydus Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MSD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zyduscadila.jpeg
Zydus Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msd-global.jpeg
MSD
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: unauthorized access, supply chain compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zydus Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to MSD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MSD company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Zydus Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, MSD company has reported more cyber incidents than Zydus Group company.

Neither MSD company nor Zydus Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

MSD company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Zydus Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither MSD company nor Zydus Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zydus Group company nor MSD company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MSD company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zydus Group company.

MSD company employs more people globally than Zydus Group company, reflecting its scale as a Pharmaceutical Manufacturing.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zydus Group nor MSD holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References