Comparison Overview

Zuppler

VS

Snowflake

Zuppler

151 E 10th Ave, Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, 19428, US
Last Update: 2026-02-26
Between 750 and 799

Zuppler is your all-in-one restaurant solution for revenue growth. Seamlessly sync online and in-store ordering, manage menu updates, orders and deliveries, and boost sales with immersive menus and strategic marketing tools—all from a unified platform.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 59
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Snowflake

Menlo Park, CA, US, 94563
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 0 and 549

Snowflake delivers the AI Data Cloud — a global network where thousands of organizations mobilize data with near-unlimited scale, concurrency, and performance. Inside the AI Data Cloud, organizations unite their siloed data, easily discover and securely share governed data, and execute diverse analytic workloads. Wherever data or users live, Snowflake delivers a single and seamless experience across multiple public clouds. Snowflake’s platform is the engine that powers and provides access to the AI Data Cloud, creating a solution for data warehousing, data lakes, data engineering, data science, data application development, and data sharing. Join Snowflake customers, partners, and data providers already taking their businesses to new frontiers in the AI Data Cloud.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 10,807
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zuppler.jpeg
Zuppler
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zuppler
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Snowflake
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zuppler in 2026.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Snowflake has 69.49% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Zuppler (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zuppler cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Snowflake (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Snowflake cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zuppler.jpeg
Zuppler
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/snowflake-computing.jpeg
Snowflake
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration Exploitation
Motivation: Data Theft, Extortion (Pay or Leak Tactics)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen credentials, Infostealer malware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zuppler company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Snowflake company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Snowflake company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Zuppler company has not reported any.

In the current year, Snowflake company has reported more cyber incidents than Zuppler company.

Snowflake company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Zuppler company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Snowflake company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Zuppler company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Snowflake company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Zuppler company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Zuppler company nor Snowflake company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Snowflake company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zuppler company.

Snowflake company employs more people globally than Zuppler company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zuppler nor Snowflake holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H