Comparison Overview

Zupkus & Angell, P.C.

VS

Kalamazoo Defender

Zupkus & Angell, P.C.

1415 Park Ave W, Denver, Colorado, 80205, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

For more than 25 years, Zupkus & Angell, P.C. has been providing both pre-litigation and litigation services to its commercial and insurance clients. Our attorneys provide legal services to the insurance industry including insurance defense and coverage analysis. Zupkus & Angell’s commercial experience spans a wide breadth of practice areas, including: employment, construction defect, transportation, products liability, premises liability, professional liability, personal injury, bankruptcy, and telecommunications cases. Members of the firm have significant experience in assisting clients avoid the severe hardship of litigation. When litigation cannot be avoided, our attorneys zealously advocate on behalf of our clients in trial and appellate courts on both the state and federal levels. Zupkus & Angell is a leader in the fields of insurance coverage, insurance bad faith, and attorney professional liability. Consequently, our attorneys are frequently called upon to serve as expert witnesses in these areas. Our Firm is comprised of a skilled group of practitioners well-versed in the legal needs of today’s businesses and insurers. We are also passionate about our unique goals and attributes as a women and minority-owned firm. We hope you will give serious consideration to developing a relationship with Zupkus & Angell.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Kalamazoo Defender

277 South Rose Street, Kalamazoo, Michigan, 49007, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Kalamazoo Defender was created through the insights and hard work of local attorneys, former judges, mental and public health experts, and community advocates working with the under served of Kalamazoo County. We are dedicated to recruiting and training attorneys who possess the requisite passion for defense work and demonstrated abilities to become outstanding in their profession. The model in which those attorneys will practice is often referred to as a “holistic” public defender. That term is used to define public defender offices that represent the whole client, including assessment and guidance in addressing collateral legal and other issues that impede a client's abilities to grow beyond a life on the margins. Criminal defendants from impoverished communities don't end up facing charges in a vacuum. Racism and barriers to safe housing, mental health services, education, nutrition, banking, and other basic needs put those living in impoverished communities at substantially greater risk of confronting criminal charges. Kalamazoo Defender will work with its clients to ensure they have the resources and community support to overcome barriers to a more stable and rewarding life, regardless of the disposition of the criminal charge.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zupkus-&-angell-p-c-.jpeg
Zupkus & Angell, P.C.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kalamazoo-defender.jpeg
Kalamazoo Defender
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zupkus & Angell, P.C.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Kalamazoo Defender
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zupkus & Angell, P.C. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Kalamazoo Defender in 2025.

Incident History — Zupkus & Angell, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zupkus & Angell, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Kalamazoo Defender (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Kalamazoo Defender cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zupkus-&-angell-p-c-.jpeg
Zupkus & Angell, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/kalamazoo-defender.jpeg
Kalamazoo Defender
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company and Kalamazoo Defender company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Kalamazoo Defender company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company.

In the current year, Kalamazoo Defender company and Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Kalamazoo Defender company nor Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Kalamazoo Defender company nor Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Kalamazoo Defender company nor Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company nor Kalamazoo Defender company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company nor Kalamazoo Defender company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Kalamazoo Defender company employs more people globally than Zupkus & Angell, P.C. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zupkus & Angell, P.C. nor Kalamazoo Defender holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X