Comparison Overview

ZTO Express

VS

Transnet SOC Ltd

ZTO Express

1685 Huazhi Road, Qingpu District Shanghai, China 201708, CN
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Founded on May 8, 2002, ZTO Express (“ZTO” or “the Company”) is one of the leading express delivery companies in China in terms of parcel volume, with a 20.4% market share in 2020. ZTO is both a key enabler and a direct beneficiary of China’s fast-growing e-commerce market, and has established itself as the trusted express delivery partner for millions of commerce customers, including online merchants and consumers selling and buying products on Chinese leading e-commerce sites, such as Alibaba, PDD, JD.com. ZTO operates a highly scalable network partner model that enables it to expand nationwide network quickly and provide e-commerce merchants with greater geographic reach at low cost. Under a network partner model, it operates the mission-critical line-haul transportation and sorting network within the express delivery service value chain, whereas its network partners operate the outlets that provide first-mile pickup and last-mile delivery services. Operational efficiency and economies of scale enable ZTO to achieve strong operating leverage which drives higher return on invested capital and equity. ZTO’s objective is to become a world-leading comprehensive logistical services provider.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Transnet SOC Ltd

138 Eloff Street, Johannesburg, Gauteng, ZA, 2001
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

As the custodian of ports, rail and pipelines, Transnet’s objective is to ensure a globally competitive freight system that enables sustained growth and diversification of the country’s economy. As a state-owned company, Transnet continues to leave an indelible mark on the lives of all South Africans. With a geographical footprint that covers our entire country, Transnet is inextricably involved in all aspects of life in South Africa. Through the Transnet Foundation - which is the Corporate Social Investment arm of Transnet - we have invested time and money in several diverse programmes around the country that provide much-needed succour to our communities. Looking ahead, Transnet is focused on modernizing infrastructure, driving growth, and enhancing efficiency through strategic partnerships. Our vision is clear: to contribute meaningfully to South Africa’s economic aspirations through sustainable growth and modernization.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 26,735
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ztoexpress.jpeg
ZTO Express
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZTO Express
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Transnet SOC Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZTO Express in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Transnet SOC Ltd in 2025.

Incident History — ZTO Express (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZTO Express cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Transnet SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Transnet SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ztoexpress.jpeg
ZTO Express
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/transnet-soc-ltd.jpeg
Transnet SOC Ltd
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ZTO Express company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Transnet SOC Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ZTO Express company has not reported any.

In the current year, Transnet SOC Ltd company and ZTO Express company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Transnet SOC Ltd company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ZTO Express company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd company nor ZTO Express company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Transnet SOC Ltd company nor ZTO Express company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZTO Express company nor Transnet SOC Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ZTO Express company nor Transnet SOC Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Transnet SOC Ltd company employs more people globally than ZTO Express company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZTO Express nor Transnet SOC Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H