Comparison Overview

ZorgPlus GGZ

VS

The MINDS Foundation

ZorgPlus GGZ

van Oldenbarneveldstraat 2c, Elst, 6662AT, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

ZorgPlus biedt ambulante (specialistische) begeleiding aan volwassenen en ouderen binnen de psychiatrie en ondersteunt bij praktische zaken op alle leefgebieden, afgestemd op de hulpvraag en problematiek. We zijn een GGZ-instelling die de kwaliteit van zorg voorop stelt. Kwaliteit van zorg is onze ruggengraat waaraan we nooit concessies doen. Op deze wijze ontwikkelen we ons tot een lerende en succesvolle organisatie met een sterke eigen (wijze) visie. Forensische zorg wordt geboden onder de naam KiSo; onderdeel van ZorgPlus. Wij hebben geen contra-indicaties, dus iedereen is welkom, zowel enkelvoudige psychiatrische problematiek, als met dubbel- en triple diagnoses (psychiatrie/verslaving/LVB/forensisch). Passend bij onze visie bieden wij, ongeacht de problematiek, goede en verantwoorde zorg met passende expertise. We hebben ervaring met complexe situaties, multi-problem gezinnen en zorgmijders. ZorgPlus biedt ambulante begeleiding in de regio’s Rijk van Nijmegen, Rivierenland, Noordoost Brabant, Arnhem, Foodvalley, Zuidoost Utrecht, Noordwest Gelderland, Achterhoek, IJsselland en Twente. Begeleiding van ZorgPlus is gericht op het zelfstandig organiseren van praktische zaken in het dagelijks leven. Dit kan zijn op alle leefgebieden van de zelfredzaamheidsmatrix, maar is afhankelijk van de hulpvraag en problematiek. Doel is om cliënten zo zelfredzaam mogelijk te laten zijn en verbetering of stabiliteit in het leven van de cliënt te krijgen.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 102
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The MINDS Foundation

Mumbai, 400013, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The MINDS Foundation has a persistent commitment to taking a grassroots approach to eliminating stigma and providing educational, financial, medical, and moral support for patients suffering from mental illness in developing countries. The MINDS Foundation was founded and incorporated in the summer of 2010. It is a registered 501(c)3 tax-exempt not-for-profit organization.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zorgplus-ggz.jpeg
ZorgPlus GGZ
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-minds-foundation.jpeg
The MINDS Foundation
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZorgPlus GGZ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The MINDS Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZorgPlus GGZ in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The MINDS Foundation in 2026.

Incident History — ZorgPlus GGZ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZorgPlus GGZ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The MINDS Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The MINDS Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zorgplus-ggz.jpeg
ZorgPlus GGZ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-minds-foundation.jpeg
The MINDS Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ZorgPlus GGZ company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to The MINDS Foundation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The MINDS Foundation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ZorgPlus GGZ company.

In the current year, The MINDS Foundation company and ZorgPlus GGZ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The MINDS Foundation company nor ZorgPlus GGZ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The MINDS Foundation company nor ZorgPlus GGZ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The MINDS Foundation company nor ZorgPlus GGZ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ company nor The MINDS Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ company nor The MINDS Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ZorgPlus GGZ company employs more people globally than The MINDS Foundation company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZorgPlus GGZ nor The MINDS Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H