Comparison Overview

ZooMontana

VS

ACMI

ZooMontana

2100 S. Shiloh Rd., Billings, MT 59106, US
Last Update: 2026-01-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zoomontana.org

ZooMontana is a zoological and botanical garden and educational facility dedicated to the conservation of wildlife throughout Montana and the 45th parallel of earth. ZooMontana cares for over 100 animals of 51 different species, including wolves, grizzly bear, otter, eagles, and lynx. Located in the picturesque tourist destination of Billings, MT, ZooMontana offers visitors a unique opportunity to learn about Yellowstone ecosystem fauna through direct observation, interpretive displays, and experiential educational programs. Annually, community and educational programs serve over 8,000 students and over 80,000 visitors, most of whom hail from the northern Rockies. Led by a 16 member staff, ZooMontana enjoys strong community support through volunteerism, donations, and outreach.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

ACMI

Federation Square, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, AU
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.acmi.net.au

ACMI is Australia's national museum of screen culture. Navigate the universe of film, TV, videogames and art with us. ACMI celebrates the wonder and power of the world’s most democratic artform – fostering the next generation of makers, players and watchers. ACMI’s vibrant calendar of exhibitions, screenings, commissions, festivals, and industry and education programs explore the stories, technologies and artists that create our shared screen culture. We're located in the heart of Melbourne in Fed Square. Explore our universe on a variety of online platforms.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 282
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoomontana.jpeg
ZooMontana
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-centre-for-the-moving-image.jpeg
ACMI
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZooMontana
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ACMI
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZooMontana in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ACMI in 2026.

Incident History — ZooMontana (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZooMontana cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ACMI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ACMI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoomontana.jpeg
ZooMontana
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/australian-centre-for-the-moving-image.jpeg
ACMI
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ACMI company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ZooMontana company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ACMI company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ZooMontana company.

In the current year, ACMI company and ZooMontana company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ACMI company nor ZooMontana company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ACMI company nor ZooMontana company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ACMI company nor ZooMontana company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZooMontana company nor ACMI company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ZooMontana company nor ACMI company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ACMI company employs more people globally than ZooMontana company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZooMontana nor ACMI holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References