Comparison Overview

Zoo New England

VS

Landmark Park Dothan

Zoo New England

1 Franklin Park Rd, Boston, 02121, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://zoonewengland.org/

Zoo New England's mission is to inspire people to protect and sustain the natural world for future generations by creating fun and engaging experiences that integrate wildlife and conservation programs, research, and education. Commonwealth Zoological Corporation D/B/A Zoo New England ("Zoo New England"​) is the private, non-profit corporation that operates Franklin Park Zoo in Boston and Stone Zoo in Stoneham, Massachusetts. Zoo New England programming is made possible through earned revenues and state, private, and corporate funding.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 218
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Landmark Park Dothan

430 Landmark Dr., Dothan, AL, 36303, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.landmarkparkdothan.com

There’s an adventure waiting for you and your family, just on the outskirts of Dothan, at Landmark Park. A 135-acre park built to preserve the natural and cultural heritage of southeast Alabama’s Wiregrass Region. Landmark Park is more than just a place to look. It is a place to participate and experience. Experience history on an 1890’s living history farm, complete with an old farmhouse, smokehouse, cane mill, syrup shed, and sheep, mules, cows, chickens, goats and pigs. Drift back in time in a Victorian gazebo, a one-room schoolhouse, a drugstore and soda fountain, a country store or a turn-of-the-century church. Experience nature with a walk through the woods on an elevated boardwalk, stroll nature trails, visit our interpretive center and planetarium, see wildlife exhibits and have a picnic in our picnic area. Experience the excitement of annual special events like folklife festivals, antique car shows, traveling exhibits, concerts and workshops. Experience the heritage of the Wiregrass Region and experience an adventure!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmarkparkdothan.jpeg
Landmark Park Dothan
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zoo New England
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Landmark Park Dothan
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoo New England in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Landmark Park Dothan in 2025.

Incident History — Zoo New England (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoo New England cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Landmark Park Dothan (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Landmark Park Dothan cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-new-england.jpeg
Zoo New England
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/landmarkparkdothan.jpeg
Landmark Park Dothan
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Zoo New England company and Landmark Park Dothan company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Landmark Park Dothan company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zoo New England company.

In the current year, Landmark Park Dothan company and Zoo New England company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Landmark Park Dothan company nor Zoo New England company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Landmark Park Dothan company nor Zoo New England company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Landmark Park Dothan company nor Zoo New England company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Landmark Park Dothan company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zoo New England company nor Landmark Park Dothan company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zoo New England company employs more people globally than Landmark Park Dothan company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zoo New England nor Landmark Park Dothan holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
References
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Published
Date
2025-12-02
Updated
Date
2025-12-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References