Comparison Overview

Zoo Boise

VS

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

Zoo Boise

None
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

Zoo Boise connects our visitors with animals to inspire and involve our community in the conservation of wildlife worldwide. Zoo Boise is a service of the City of Boise and is supported by the Friends of Zoo Boise, a 501(c)(3) membership organization that supports Zoo Boise in the area of animal acquisition, capital improvement projects, education programs, volunteer opportunities, and special events. The goal of each of these components is to increase public awareness, knowledge, and appreciation of the zoo, wild animals, animal habitats, species conservation, and the environment. Zoo Boise is accredited by the Association of Zoos & Aquariums (AZA). Look for the AZA logo whenever you visit a zoo or aquarium as your assurance that you are supporting a facility dedicated to providing excellent care for animals, a great experience for you, and a better future for all living things. Friends of Zoo Boise is a 501(c)(3) charitable organization (tax ID #82-6005995). All gifts are tax deductible and qualify for the Idaho State Education Tax Credit.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania

100 E. Northwestern Ave, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19118, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22

The Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania is a historic public garden and educational institution. It promotes an understanding of the relationship between plants, people and place through programs that integrate science, art and the humanities. The Arboretum conducts four major activities: education, research, outreach, and horticultural display. As the official Arboretum of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, the Morris Arboretum of the University of Pennsylvania provides research and outreach services to state agencies, community institutions and to citizens of Pennsylvania and beyond.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-boise.jpeg
Zoo Boise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zoo Boise
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zoo Boise in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania in 2026.

Incident History — Zoo Boise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoo Boise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoo-boise.jpeg
Zoo Boise
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/morris-arboretum-of-the-univ.jpeg
Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Zoo Boise company and Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zoo Boise company.

In the current year, Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company and Zoo Boise company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Zoo Boise company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Zoo Boise company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company nor Zoo Boise company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zoo Boise company nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zoo Boise company.

Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania company employs more people globally than Zoo Boise company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zoo Boise nor Morris Arboretum & Gardens of the University of Pennsylvania holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H