Comparison Overview

Zone Graphics Ltd

VS

LogoPro

Zone Graphics Ltd

Unit 51 Eldon Way, Paddock Wood, Tonbridge, Kent, GB, TN12 6BE
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Having been established for 14 years we have built a very successful reputation and we pride ourselves on the relationships we build with clients, both existing and new. With our combined experience of over 70 years in the reproduction and printing world, we are able to cover all aspects of the industry with efficiency and expertise. Our backgrounds range from conventional planning, printing, scanning, graphic design and IT to name a few.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

LogoPro

Ffynnonau Gleision, Llandysul, SA44 5SW, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Logopro, bespoke logo design online. Experienced graphic designers, helping business start-ups, entrepreneurs and established SME's find their identity. Tailor-made logo design is the starting point. A strong identity is the next step to branding your business, leading to customer engagement and loyalty. We work closely with our clients, knowing that a good understanding of their business and ethos leads to the best possible results. Logopro based in West Wales, working for business worldwide.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zone-graphics-ltd.jpeg
Zone Graphics Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/logopro.jpeg
LogoPro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zone Graphics Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
LogoPro
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zone Graphics Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for LogoPro in 2025.

Incident History — Zone Graphics Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zone Graphics Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — LogoPro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LogoPro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zone-graphics-ltd.jpeg
Zone Graphics Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/logopro.jpeg
LogoPro
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

LogoPro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zone Graphics Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, LogoPro company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zone Graphics Ltd company.

In the current year, LogoPro company and Zone Graphics Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither LogoPro company nor Zone Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither LogoPro company nor Zone Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither LogoPro company nor Zone Graphics Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd company nor LogoPro company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd company nor LogoPro company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

LogoPro company employs more people globally than Zone Graphics Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zone Graphics Ltd nor LogoPro holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X