Comparison Overview

Zoho

VS

Lazada

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.zoho.com/

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,539
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Lazada

51 Bras Basah Road, Singapore, Singapore, SG, 189554
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://group.lazada.com/

About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and payments networks in the region, Lazada is a part of our consumers’ daily lives in the region and we aim to serve 300 million shoppers by 2030. Since 2016, Lazada is the Southeast Asia flagship platform of the Alibaba Group powered by its cutting-edge technology infrastructure.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 21,422
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lazada.jpeg
Lazada
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zoho
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lazada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Zoho has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lazada in 2025.

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lazada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lazada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lazada.jpeg
Lazada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Lazada company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Zoho company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lazada company has not reported any.

In the current year, Zoho company has reported more cyber incidents than Lazada company.

Neither Lazada company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Lazada company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lazada company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Zoho company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lazada company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zoho company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Lazada company.

Zoho company employs more people globally than Lazada company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zoho nor Lazada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References