Comparison Overview

Zoho

VS

GlobalLogic

Zoho

Zoho Corporation Pvt. Ltd, Estancia IT Park, Plot No. 140 & 151,, Chennai, 603202, IN
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Zoho offers beautifully smart software to help you grow your business. With over 100 million users worldwide, Zoho's 55+ products aid your sales and marketing, support and collaboration, finance, and recruitment needs—letting you focus only on your business. Zoho respects user privacy and does not have an ad-revenue model in any part of its business, including its free products. Zoho Corporation is privately held and profitable, with its headquarters in Chennai, India, and offices across the globe.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 29,539
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

GlobalLogic

2535 Augustine Drive, 5th Floor, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 700 and 749

GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group company, is a trusted partner in design, data, and digital engineering for the world’s largest and most innovative companies. Since our inception in 2000, we have been at the forefront of the digital revolution, helping to create some of the most widely used digital products and experiences. Our purpose is to positively impact society and the planet through cutting-edge technology. Together with our clients, we are engineering impact through intelligent products, platforms, and services that are designed for desirability, engineered for excellence, and curated for intelligence. Our people-first culture fosters shoulder-to-shoulder teamwork, supported by a unique lab model and flexible delivery options, including onshore, nearshore, and offshore solutions. We also prioritize environmental stewardship in our product development and are committed to leveraging the diversity of thoughts as a driver for business innovation, attracting and developing talent, and sustainable growth. We are proud of our global recognitions: Leader in the ISG Provider Lens™ Digital Engineering Services 2024 U.S. report Everest Group's Software Product Engineering Services Peak Matrix 2024 Star Performer in Major Contender in Everest Group’s Trust & Safety Peak Matrix 2024 2024 EcoVadis Silver Sustainability Rating Join us as we continue to shape the future of digital engineering and create lasting impacts for businesses and communities worldwide: globallogic.com

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 32,464
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zoho
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GlobalLogic
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

Zoho has 75.44% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

GlobalLogic has 250.88% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Zoho (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zoho cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GlobalLogic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GlobalLogic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zoho.jpeg
Zoho
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Authentication Bypass
Motivation: Account Takeover, Access Sensitive Data
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/globallogic.jpeg
GlobalLogic
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Exploitation of zero-day vulnerability in Oracle E-Business Suite
Motivation: Data Theft, Potential Extortion (unconfirmed ransom demand)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Zoho company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to GlobalLogic company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

GlobalLogic company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Zoho company.

In the current year, GlobalLogic company has reported more cyber incidents than Zoho company.

GlobalLogic company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Zoho company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GlobalLogic company nor Zoho company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Both Zoho company and GlobalLogic company have disclosed vulnerabilities.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zoho company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to GlobalLogic company.

GlobalLogic company employs more people globally than Zoho company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zoho nor GlobalLogic holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N