Comparison Overview

ZML Consulting

VS

Hugh Jones Solicitors

ZML Consulting

765 Amsterdam Ave, New York, NY, 10001, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At ZML Consulting, we connect attorneys with medical expert witnesses who help win cases. Whether it is a medical malpractice, personal injury, pharmaceutical liability, medical device injury case or other legal matter - we work closely with attorneys and our expert physicians and scientists to ensure that we match attorneys with experts who are both qualified and effective.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hugh Jones Solicitors

2 The Malthouse, Deva City Office Park, Manchester, M3 7BD, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Hugh Jones Solicitors is a law firm founded by Hugh Jones who is a nationally recognised expert solicitor with over 30 years’ experience in supporting people with mental incapacity, their families and their advisers. We are an independent, specialist practice, focusing purely on Court of Protection and connected work. Hugh has brought together a caring, compassionate and skilled team. We provide a pool of expertise available to support our clients and our service is personal, friendly and cost effective and we work only in the field of mental incapacity so you can be sure that you are getting the best quality advice.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 58
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zml-consulting.jpeg
ZML Consulting
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hugh-jones-solicitors.jpeg
Hugh Jones Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZML Consulting
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hugh Jones Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZML Consulting in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hugh Jones Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — ZML Consulting (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZML Consulting cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hugh Jones Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hugh Jones Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zml-consulting.jpeg
ZML Consulting
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hugh-jones-solicitors.jpeg
Hugh Jones Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ZML Consulting company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hugh Jones Solicitors company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hugh Jones Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ZML Consulting company.

In the current year, Hugh Jones Solicitors company and ZML Consulting company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hugh Jones Solicitors company nor ZML Consulting company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hugh Jones Solicitors company nor ZML Consulting company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hugh Jones Solicitors company nor ZML Consulting company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZML Consulting company nor Hugh Jones Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ZML Consulting company nor Hugh Jones Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hugh Jones Solicitors company employs more people globally than ZML Consulting company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZML Consulting nor Hugh Jones Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X