Comparison Overview

Zitron Australia Pty Ltd

VS

ANDRITZ Recycling

Zitron Australia Pty Ltd

3 Redemptora Rd, Perth, Western Australia, 6166, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Zitrón was founded in 1963 in the Spanish province of Asturias and is today the world’s leading supplier of ventilation systems for underground tunnels (both mining and transportation). With productions centres in nine countries distributed over five continents, Zitrón is able to offer its clients custom designed and engineered solutions for their specific ventilation requirements. All Zitrón primary ventilation systems are tested in our manufacturing facility located in Asturias, Spain. This resource is the largest axial fan test bench in the world. Accredited by the “Air Movement and Control Association (AMCA) International”, the test bench is 100m long and has a cross-section of 52 square metres. Fans with impeller diameters of up to 5.2m can be tested across their total operating range, including the “stall” status, whilst running at their full nominal speed and as per the parameters nominated by clients. Zitrón Australia was formed in 2011 to expand the local business, with the aim of building on the market gains achieved in earlier years when Zitrón products were supplied by Downunder Mining Pty Ltd under a licence arrangement that has been in place since 1998. Today, Zitrón is firmly established as a major player in the Australian underground ventilation market, with an acknowledged reputation for the quality of our work and for our willingness to go to the next level to ensure that you have the optimal solutions for your specific environments. We combine global strength with local experience and capabilities to further our goal of being the underground ventilation provider of choice in Australia and beyond.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 23
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ANDRITZ Recycling

Stattegger Straße, Graz, AT
Last Update: 2025-11-27

As an innovative technology supplier, ANDRITZ has also been a reliable partner for the processing industry in the megatrend of recycling for many years. Beyond the market opportunities, ANDRITZ also sees its technological commitment in the field of recycling as a responsibility for greater sustainability and careful use of the limited resources that our planet offers us. ANDRITZ Recycling is a cooperation between several technology areas of the ANDRITZ Group, consisting of ANDRITZ Pulp & Paper, ANDRITZ Nonwoven & Textile, ANDRITZ Feed and Biofuel, and others. One focus of this channel is on the area of technologies for the reprocessing of textiles. The world of textiles and the textile industry should be under no illusions about their responsibilities. The price of fast fashion is that making clothes accounts for around 10 percent of CO₂ emissions from human activity. But despite the need for circularity in our use of resources, the clothing industry has been fed by a distinctly linear value chain. Clothing is notoriously over-supplied, and while it might be resold, recycled into cloths or insulation, much of it ends up incinerated or in landfill. Textile-to-textile circularity has been conspicuously absent. ANDRITZ technology can help to stop growing these mountains of waste.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zitron-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Zitron Australia Pty Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andritz-recycling.jpeg
ANDRITZ Recycling
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zitron Australia Pty Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ANDRITZ Recycling
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zitron Australia Pty Ltd in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Recycling in 2025.

Incident History — Zitron Australia Pty Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zitron Australia Pty Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ANDRITZ Recycling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ Recycling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zitron-australia-pty-ltd.jpeg
Zitron Australia Pty Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/andritz-recycling.jpeg
ANDRITZ Recycling
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ANDRITZ Recycling company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ANDRITZ Recycling company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company.

In the current year, ANDRITZ Recycling company and Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ANDRITZ Recycling company nor Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company nor ANDRITZ Recycling company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ANDRITZ Recycling company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company.

Zitron Australia Pty Ltd company employs more people globally than ANDRITZ Recycling company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zitron Australia Pty Ltd nor ANDRITZ Recycling holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H