Comparison Overview

Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services

VS

NA

Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services

2307 Olive St, Atlantic, 50022, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://zioniowa.org/

ZION Integrated Behavioral Health Services is a person-centered organization that instils vital life skills in those we serve by maximizing the ability to develop and maintain healthy alternatives through prevention and treatment services. We strive to provide services designed to empower those we serve by utilizing a recovery-oriented system of care that allows us to implement proven standards and practices designed to enrich individual wellbeing. We value collaboration and partnerships that allow us to effectively meet the needs of those we serve.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 13
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

NA

US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.qboutcomes.com

Quality Behavioral Outcomes QBO works to create genuine partnerships with children, youth, families, schools, organizations and professionals to provide the highest possible standard of behavioral health care, education, and consultation. Our goals are to 1) achieve positive behavioral outcomes for children and youth; 2) increase the knowledge and skills of individuals, teams, and organizations to develop and maintain healthy behaviors; 3) enable our partners to reduce potential problems and successfully address future challenges; and 4) obtain these quality outcomes in an efficient and effective manner.

NAICS: 62133
NAICS Definition: Offices of Mental Health Practitioners (except Physicians)
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zion-integrated-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
NA
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services in 2026.

Incidents vs Mental Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NA in 2026.

Incident History — Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zion-integrated-behavioral-health-services.jpeg
Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
NA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to NA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company.

In the current year, NA company and Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NA company nor Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NA company nor Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NA company nor Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company nor NA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company nor NA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

NA company employs more people globally than Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services company, reflecting its scale as a Mental Health Care.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zion Integrated Behavioral Health Services nor NA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References