Comparison Overview

ZINKE LAW FIRM

VS

Jones Divorce & Family Law

ZINKE LAW FIRM

P.O. Box 88300, Carol Stream, IL, 60188-8300, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

ZINKE LAW FIRM John Zinke, Attorney at Law P.O.Box 88300, Carol Stream, IL 60188-0300 website: http://www.zinkelawfirm.com e-mail: [email protected] fax: 630-588-8839 phone: 630-988-9300 *Legal Services now available on a Contract, Temporary, Project, Consultant & Independent Contractor basis through the ZINKE LAW FIRM including: • Preparation of commercial & residential real estate contracts & real estate closings, short-sales, foreclosures • Corporate law & business counseling, including contract negotiation, document review & drafting • Commercial finance & Collections • Wills, trusts, probate • Real estate title insurance JOHN ZINKE is and has been a licensed attorney in the State of Illinois since 1991 and concentrates his real estate law practice and title agent business on real estate contracts, closings and litigation including secured transactions, equipment leasing, commercial & residential real estate, and all aspects of the representation of real estate buyers & sellers, equipment leasing companies, mortgage lenders, banks, finance companies, and asset based lenders in the areas of vendor sales and marketing, credit, operations, funding sources and syndications, customer service, collections, foreclosure, replevin, repossession, remarketing and all aspects of transactions from front-end contract drafting and negotiation to back-end enforcement, collection, foreclosure, regulatory compliance, state and federal litigation, class actions, and bankruptcy. DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this website is not intended to create, and receipt of it does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. It is also not intended to seek engagement in any state where the attorney is not admitted to practice. Examples provided are not intended to create the expectation that the same results could be obtained for other clients in similar matters without reference to the specific factual and legal circumstances of each client’s case.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Jones Divorce & Family Law

1400, 639 - 5th Avenue SW, Calgary, Alberta, T2P 0M9, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-28

We are a boutique firm specializing in divorce and family law. Our partners, associates and staff bring over 65 years of combined family law experience, with demonstrated expertise in mediation, arbitration, negotiation, parenting coordination and collaborative law. Our approach is defined by collaboration and expertise to advocate for resolution. We respect the dynamic nature of every unique case, embrace challenges and strive to deliver progressive, family-oriented solutions. Our skilled Calgary divorce lawyers know that this is your life and you are the one that has to live with the results of your file. While the major decisions should be yours to make, we will give you our professional opinion along with the reasoning behind them. Jones Divorce Law LLP is exclusively devoted to family and divorce law, including divorce, custody, parenting, access, division of property, common law separations, child support, spousal support, adoption and more. We take a practical approach and we know the law and the factors to consider. We value ongoing legal education and we study divorce law cases on a regular and consistent basis to ensure that we are up to date on the most current legal trends and are able to offer those benefits to our clients. Let's connect at [email protected] or our main line at (587) 393-8070, fax (587) 393-8071. We are located in downtown Calgary, Alberta at: 1400, 639 5th Avenue SW Calgary, Alberta T2P 0M9

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zinke-law-firm.jpeg
ZINKE LAW FIRM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-divorce-law-llp.jpeg
Jones Divorce & Family Law
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ZINKE LAW FIRM
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Jones Divorce & Family Law
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ZINKE LAW FIRM in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Jones Divorce & Family Law in 2025.

Incident History — ZINKE LAW FIRM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ZINKE LAW FIRM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Jones Divorce & Family Law (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Jones Divorce & Family Law cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zinke-law-firm.jpeg
ZINKE LAW FIRM
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/jones-divorce-law-llp.jpeg
Jones Divorce & Family Law
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Jones Divorce & Family Law company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ZINKE LAW FIRM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Jones Divorce & Family Law company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ZINKE LAW FIRM company.

In the current year, Jones Divorce & Family Law company and ZINKE LAW FIRM company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Jones Divorce & Family Law company nor ZINKE LAW FIRM company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Jones Divorce & Family Law company nor ZINKE LAW FIRM company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Jones Divorce & Family Law company nor ZINKE LAW FIRM company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM company nor Jones Divorce & Family Law company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM company nor Jones Divorce & Family Law company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Jones Divorce & Family Law company employs more people globally than ZINKE LAW FIRM company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ZINKE LAW FIRM nor Jones Divorce & Family Law holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X