Comparison Overview

Zing Graphics

VS

Allen-Bailey Tag & Label

Zing Graphics

11612 Washington Blvd, Whittier, California, 90606, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zinggraphics.com

Large Format Digital Printing. Specialize in super wide printing. Grand format dyesub, and special sewing applications. Using the latest equipment to produce highest quality graphics, for your events, trade show exhibits, and vehicle graphics. Our company produces the highest quality digital prints and banners to professionally promote your business and serve your needs.With over 15 years of experience, an in house art department, brilliant pre press department, and our own finishing department you will be impressed with our competitive pricing, blazing fast turnaround times, and amazing customer service. Please take time to browse the multitude of types of products and services we are able to offer you and consider giving us a call for a quick quote. We are certain you will not be disappointed! We also provide complete shipping and delivery services, and if you require, our installation experts will insure that your project will look its best.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Allen-Bailey Tag & Label

3177 Lehigh Street, Caledonia, NY, 14423, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
https://www.abtl.com/

Quality Driven, Customer Focused ™ Allen-Bailey Tag & Label is a nationally recognized source for custom printed tags and labels. It has been in continuous business for over 100 years and served many prominent large and small businesses for decades. Located in Caledonia, NY, Allen-Bailey provides custom identification solutions to customers all across the U.S., Mexico and Canada. It serves an expansive group of markets such as agriculture, hospitality, retail, healthcare, general industry, shellfish, fire, automotive, steel, wire, cable and many more. Allen-Bailey is committed to providing its customers with the best service and product quality while focusing on their long-term product needs. Allen-Bailey is a subsidiary of Ennis Inc

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 42
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zing-graphics.jpeg
Zing Graphics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abtaglabel.jpeg
Allen-Bailey Tag & Label
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zing Graphics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Allen-Bailey Tag & Label
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zing Graphics in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allen-Bailey Tag & Label in 2025.

Incident History — Zing Graphics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zing Graphics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Allen-Bailey Tag & Label (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allen-Bailey Tag & Label cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zing-graphics.jpeg
Zing Graphics
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abtaglabel.jpeg
Allen-Bailey Tag & Label
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zing Graphics company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zing Graphics company.

In the current year, Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company and Zing Graphics company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company nor Zing Graphics company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company nor Zing Graphics company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company nor Zing Graphics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zing Graphics company nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zing Graphics company nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Allen-Bailey Tag & Label company employs more people globally than Zing Graphics company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zing Graphics nor Allen-Bailey Tag & Label holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References