Comparison Overview

Zimmermann Company

VS

Southern Label Company

Zimmermann Company

3418 Washington Avenue, Sheboygan, WI, 53081, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1874 and family owned for five generations and counting, Zimmermann Company is a single source for not only offset, digital and large format printing, but also ecommerce, mailing, fulfillment and material warehousing. After nearly a century and a half of business Zimmermann continues to invest in industry leading software and equipment as an important part of our streamlined operations. So for your next job trust a company that has supported the community for 140 years yet is cutting edge today.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Southern Label Company

5624 Clifford Circle, Birmingham, Alabama, 35210, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

In 1968, with a small press, an entrepreneurial spirit and a “customer first” philosophy, Walter Bailey founded Southern Label Company in the basement of his home. Over Fifty years later with the same “customer first” philosophy, this family business now occupies over 50,000 square feet and has a client base worldwide. Customer satisfaction is at the core of our business and customers trust us to provide quality printed and converted products. At Southern Label Company, we sell quality printed and converted products at a competitive price with prompt, friendly service and reliable delivery. It’s an old habit we don’t want to break. Fifty years of experience, fifty years of commitment to serving the customer, fifty years of quality printed and converted products. Tapes and labels for school, office and home products, juvenile products, home textiles, food packaging and for in-house printing applications. We offer a wide range of products for today’s label and tape market. Working with first class suppliers of paper, film, inks, coatings and adhesives, machinery and computers we create the quality products you require. In every phase of interactions with the customer, from quoting to shipping, Southern Label relies upon its most valuable assets: employee experience, expertise, and commitment to a job well done. If we can find a “better” way that seems to make sense and save money for the customer, we’ll offer it. How much is that experience worth in the market? Just consider our steady growth, year after year, since 1968.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 21
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zimmermann-company.jpeg
Zimmermann Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-label-company.jpeg
Southern Label Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zimmermann Company
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Southern Label Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zimmermann Company in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Southern Label Company in 2025.

Incident History — Zimmermann Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zimmermann Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Southern Label Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Southern Label Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zimmermann-company.jpeg
Zimmermann Company
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/southern-label-company.jpeg
Southern Label Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Zimmermann Company company and Southern Label Company company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Southern Label Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zimmermann Company company.

In the current year, Southern Label Company company and Zimmermann Company company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Southern Label Company company nor Zimmermann Company company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Southern Label Company company nor Zimmermann Company company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Southern Label Company company nor Zimmermann Company company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zimmermann Company company nor Southern Label Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zimmermann Company company nor Southern Label Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Southern Label Company company employs more people globally than Zimmermann Company company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zimmermann Company nor Southern Label Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N