Comparison Overview

Zhou B Art Center

VS

Singapore Art Museum

Zhou B Art Center

1029 W. 35th Street, Chicago, IL, 60609, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zhoubartcenter.com

The Zhou B Art Center was founded in 2004 by the internationally acclaimed Zhou Brothers. Located in Bridgeport, the Zhou B Art Center's mission is to promote and facilitate a cultural dialogue by organizing contemporary art exhibitions and programs of international scope. As a Center created by artists, for artists, the vision of the Center is to facilitate the exchange of contemporary art between Chicago and the international art community and promote the convergence of Eastern and Western art forms in the United States.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 17
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Singapore Art Museum

39 Keppel Road, #01-02 Tanjong Pagar Distripark, Singapore, 089065, SG
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799
http://www.singaporeartmuseum.sg/

Singapore Art Museum opened in 1996 as the first art museum in Singapore. Also known as SAM, we present contemporary art from a Southeast Asian perspective for artists, art lovers and the art curious in multiple venues across the island, including a new venue in the historic port area of Tanjong Pagar. SAM is building one of the world's most important public collections of Southeast Asian contemporary art, with the aim of connecting the art and the artists to the public and future generations through exhibitions and programmes. SAM is working towards a humane and sustainable future by committing to responsible practices within its processes. For more information, visit www.singaporeartmuseum.sg.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 114
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zhou-b-art-center.jpeg
Zhou B Art Center
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-art-museum.jpeg
Singapore Art Museum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zhou B Art Center
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Singapore Art Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zhou B Art Center in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Singapore Art Museum in 2026.

Incident History — Zhou B Art Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zhou B Art Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Singapore Art Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Singapore Art Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zhou-b-art-center.jpeg
Zhou B Art Center
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/singapore-art-museum.jpeg
Singapore Art Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Singapore Art Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zhou B Art Center company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Singapore Art Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zhou B Art Center company.

In the current year, Singapore Art Museum company and Zhou B Art Center company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor Zhou B Art Center company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor Zhou B Art Center company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Singapore Art Museum company nor Zhou B Art Center company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zhou B Art Center company nor Singapore Art Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zhou B Art Center company nor Singapore Art Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Singapore Art Museum company employs more people globally than Zhou B Art Center company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zhou B Art Center nor Singapore Art Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References