Comparison Overview

Zepp Graphical

VS

PS.Design

Zepp Graphical

3253 Chrales Griffin Drive, Garnet Valley, PA, 19060, US
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Zepp Graphical was created in 2004 as a way to unite many resources together to bring affordable design to the world. We have a very simple philosophy, we listen. Sounds like an easy concept, but it is a concept that is often forgotten. Zepp Graphical's smaller size allows personal attention to each and every account while delivering big company Web Site Design, and Graphic Design. Zepp Graphical specializes in Web Design and Graphic Design utilizing years and years of experience in the design world to bring you on target, on time and on budget projects.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PS.Design

2921 Walnut Street, Denver, CO, 80205, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

We’ve been in the graphic design and branding business for years. And now we’re pushing the boundaries of our traditional work by creating brand-relevant experimental art and immersive experiences. Our belief is that a brand can embrace art as a means of communicating culture, values, and a clients willingness to express themselves in non-traditional ways. That a full sensory immersive experience can provide access and impact to a brand that digital design can’t always fully express. That brands that embrace art illustrate an understanding that their spaces, events and can be wildly experimental and fun.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zepp-graphical.jpeg
Zepp Graphical
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psdotdesign.jpeg
PS.Design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zepp Graphical
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PS.Design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zepp Graphical in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PS.Design in 2025.

Incident History — Zepp Graphical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zepp Graphical cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PS.Design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PS.Design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zepp-graphical.jpeg
Zepp Graphical
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/psdotdesign.jpeg
PS.Design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PS.Design company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zepp Graphical company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PS.Design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zepp Graphical company.

In the current year, PS.Design company and Zepp Graphical company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PS.Design company nor Zepp Graphical company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PS.Design company nor Zepp Graphical company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PS.Design company nor Zepp Graphical company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zepp Graphical company nor PS.Design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zepp Graphical company nor PS.Design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Zepp Graphical company and PS.Design company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zepp Graphical nor PS.Design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X