Comparison Overview

Zeng Law Group, PLLC

VS

James Murray Solicitors

Zeng Law Group, PLLC

100 Church Street, Suite 800, None, New York, New York, US, 10007
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

At Zeng Law Group, we create opportunities. From individuals and small local businesses to the world’s largest companies, we support all of your legal needs, all over the world. We start by understanding each client’s business in great detail and working with them to create a legal strategy that is consistent with their business objectives. We have offices in New York. ​ Since the firm’s inception, we help clients bridge diverse legal systems and cultures, with a focus on efficient and effective strategic advice and legal services. We have distinguished ourselves by providing legal solutions for our clients in various legal areas, including corporate & securities, business immigration & compliance, real estate, intellectual property, trusts & estates and US-China related practice. We guide our client every step of the way. ​ Zeng Law Group, PLLC provides legal services globally in coordination with its branches around the world. We know every case matters and we always deliver the best!

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

James Murray Solicitors

None
Last Update: 2025-11-28

James Murray Solicitors are a leading high street litigation law firm in Liverpool and Bootle, Merseyside. It deals with all types of Criminal Law, Civil Law and Family Law - and in fact any field of the law where courtroom persuasive techniques are required. We have a strong reputation as a training firm - the managing partner, Paul Fletcher is a senior law lecturer at the local university and Jim Murray, the senior partner has a Masters in Law in litigation, and so both focus on taking raw law graduates to the heights of expertise in building winning cases for clients using leading edge, persuasive techniques.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 46
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zeng-law-group-pllc.jpeg
Zeng Law Group, PLLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-murray-solicitors.jpeg
James Murray Solicitors
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zeng Law Group, PLLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
James Murray Solicitors
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zeng Law Group, PLLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for James Murray Solicitors in 2025.

Incident History — Zeng Law Group, PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zeng Law Group, PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — James Murray Solicitors (X = Date, Y = Severity)

James Murray Solicitors cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zeng-law-group-pllc.jpeg
Zeng Law Group, PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/james-murray-solicitors.jpeg
James Murray Solicitors
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

James Murray Solicitors company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zeng Law Group, PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, James Murray Solicitors company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zeng Law Group, PLLC company.

In the current year, James Murray Solicitors company and Zeng Law Group, PLLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither James Murray Solicitors company nor Zeng Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither James Murray Solicitors company nor Zeng Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither James Murray Solicitors company nor Zeng Law Group, PLLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC company nor James Murray Solicitors company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC company nor James Murray Solicitors company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

James Murray Solicitors company employs more people globally than Zeng Law Group, PLLC company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zeng Law Group, PLLC nor James Murray Solicitors holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X