Comparison Overview

Zeller+Gmelin Corporation

VS

The Wrong End of Town

Zeller+Gmelin Corporation

4801 Audubon Drive, Richmond, Virginia, 23231, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www2.zeller-gmelin.us/?utm_source=Linkedin&utm_medium=social

The name Zeller+Gmelin has been known for having for the highest quality ink solutions for over 150 years. We work closely with our customers to develop individual ink and adhesive solutions for simple to complex applications. Offering solutions for all your UV/LED printing applications in the Commercial, Packaging and Tag & Label markets, Zeller+Gmelin strives to be your dedicated print partner and total solution provider. North American operations are based in Richmond, VA, with branch facilities in CA, IL, KS and TX and sales representatives located in a city near you. Visit our website to learn more and contact our team today to discuss how Zeller + Gmelin can improve your profitability.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

The Wrong End of Town

196-197 London Road, Dover, Kent, GB, CT17 0TF
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.TheWrongEndofTown.co.uk

The Wrong End of Town, based on London Road in Dover, is a creative business and was founded in 2016. Born from a career in print and marketing, we started the business to continue our passion in helping businesses in the local community evolve and thrive. We pride ourselves on supporting local businesses with design, print, branding and workwear. In addition, with our hands-on creative background, we also offer personalised gifts and merchandise, which we hand craft in store for our customers. We also sell on Etsy and through our Facebook shop.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zeller-gmelin-corporation.jpeg
Zeller+Gmelin Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wrong-end-of-town.jpeg
The Wrong End of Town
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zeller+Gmelin Corporation
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Wrong End of Town
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zeller+Gmelin Corporation in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Wrong End of Town in 2025.

Incident History — Zeller+Gmelin Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zeller+Gmelin Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Wrong End of Town (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Wrong End of Town cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zeller-gmelin-corporation.jpeg
Zeller+Gmelin Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-wrong-end-of-town.jpeg
The Wrong End of Town
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Wrong End of Town company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Wrong End of Town company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company.

In the current year, The Wrong End of Town company and Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Wrong End of Town company nor Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Wrong End of Town company nor Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Wrong End of Town company nor Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company nor The Wrong End of Town company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company nor The Wrong End of Town company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Zeller+Gmelin Corporation company employs more people globally than The Wrong End of Town company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zeller+Gmelin Corporation nor The Wrong End of Town holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References