Comparison Overview

Zebra Technologies

VS

SoftServe

Zebra Technologies

3 Overlook Point, Lincolnshire, IL, US, 60069
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Zebra provides the foundation for intelligent operations with an award-winning portfolio of connected frontline, asset visibility and automation solutions. Organizations globally across retail, manufacturing, transportation, logistics, healthcare, and other industries rely on us to deliver outcomes today while driving innovation for what’s next. Together with our partners, we create new ways of working that improve productivity and empower organizations to be better every day. Learn more at www.zebra.com.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 11,660
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

SoftServe

201 W 5th Street , Austin, 78701, US
Last Update: 2026-01-25
Between 750 and 799

SoftServe is a premier IT consulting and digital services provider. We expand the horizon of new technologies to solve today's complex business challenges and achieve meaningful outcomes for our clients. Our boundless curiosity drives us to explore and reimagine the art of the possible. Clients confidently rely on SoftServe to architect and execute mature and innovative capabilities, such as digital engineering, data and analytics, cloud, and AI/ML. Our global reputation is gained from more than 30 years of experience delivering superior digital solutions at exceptional speed by top-tier engineering talent to enterprise industries, including high tech, financial services, healthcare, life sciences, retail, energy, and manufacturing. At SoftServe, we live by our values. Trust, teamwork, growth, innovation, willingness to help, and exceeding expectations are engrained in everything we do. We partner with major technology players, such as Google Cloud Platform, Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, Salesforce, NVIDIA, MuleSoft, VMware, and Odoo, to give clients a competitive advantage in the market. Founded in 1993, our global firm is headquartered in Austin, Texas, USA, and Lviv, Ukraine. Visit our website, blog, media, and news pages for more information. Blog: softserveinc.com/blog Media: softserveinc.com/media News: softserveinc.com/news

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,373
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softserve.jpeg
SoftServe
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Zebra Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SoftServe
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Zebra Technologies in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SoftServe in 2026.

Incident History — Zebra Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Zebra Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SoftServe (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SoftServe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/zebra-technologies.jpeg
Zebra Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/softserve.jpeg
SoftServe
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Zebra Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SoftServe company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, SoftServe company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Zebra Technologies company.

In the current year, SoftServe company and Zebra Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SoftServe company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither SoftServe company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither SoftServe company nor Zebra Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies company nor SoftServe company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Zebra Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to SoftServe company.

Zebra Technologies company employs more people globally than SoftServe company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Zebra Technologies nor SoftServe holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

The WP Go Maps (formerly WP Google Maps) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the processBackgroundAction() function in all versions up to, and including, 10.0.04. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to modify global map engine settings.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The Save as PDF Plugin by PDFCrowd plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘options’ parameter in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.5 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that execute if they can successfully trick a user into performing an action such as clicking on a link. NOTE: Successful exploitation of this vulnerability requires that the PDFCrowd API key is blank (also known as "demo mode", which is the default configuration when the plugin is installed) or known.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Hustle – Email Marketing, Lead Generation, Optins, Popups plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to incorrect file type validation in the action_import_module() function in all versions up to, and including, 7.8.9.2. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with a lower-privileged role (e.g., Subscriber-level access and above), to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible. Successful exploitation requires an admin to grant Hustle module permissions (or module edit access) to the low-privileged user so they can access the Hustle admin page and obtain the required nonce.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

The WP Directory Kit plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.9 via the wdk_public_action AJAX handler. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract email addresses for users with Directory Kit-specific user roles.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Meta-box GalleryMeta plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via admin settings in all versions up to, and including, 3.0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with editor-level permissions and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This only affects multi-site installations and installations where unfiltered_html has been disabled.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N